Op-Ed. Twenty is plenty

A pedestrian hit by a car at 40 mph has a 95% chance of being killed, at 30 mph this becomes 50% and at 20 mph it becomes 5%.

- Dr. Stephen J. Watkins, from the National Health Service, UK

Speed contributes to causing accidents and it also increases their severity.

A pedestrian hit by a car at 40 mph has a 95% chance of being killed, at 30 mph this becomes 50% and at 20 mph it becomes 5%.

Most child pedestrian road deaths would be averted if people drove at 20 mph in side streets. As few places are more than a mile from a main road, few journeys involve more than two miles on side roads (a mile at each end). The difference between driving two miles at 20 mph and at 40 mph is 3 minutes.

We are killing our children to save less than three minutes on our journeys.

In residential side roads 20 is plenty.

To enforce this policy we need

• A 20 mph speed limit in residential side streets

• A recognition that motorists are solely responsible for the injuries that occur in accidents in residential side streets to the extent that they exceed those that might have been expected at 20 mph. The concept of contributory negligence by pedestrians should apply only to injuries that would have been likely to have occurred anyway at 20 mph. Any excess over that should be the motorist’s fault.

• Ideally we need to reshape streets so that they are used primarily for community use and the vehicle is a guest.

The Dutch concept of the “Woonerf” (living street) (often called Home Zones in the UK, although the Woonerf is more radical than many Home Zones) divides up the street for community use. Car parking spaces are provided, usually in nose to kerb car parking places so that the parked cars add to the obstacles to traffic. Space is allocated to gardens, trees, communal meeting space and play areas. The carriageway becomes simply the gap between obstacles and is usually arranged in chicanes to slow traffic down.

This concept has other advantages as well as slowing traffic down. It increases community networking and social support (the Appleyard & LIntell study in San Francisco, recently replicated in the UK, has shown that people know more of their neighbours in lightly-trafficked streets). It improves environments. It creates usable greenspace. It increases the aesthetic attractiveness of the street so as to encourage walking.

Dr. Stephen J. Watkins,
Stockport Primary Care Trust
National Health Service, Stockport, UK
About these ads

One thought on “Op-Ed. Twenty is plenty

  1. Reblogged this on Front gardens of Cardiff and commented:
    Cardiff has recently launched the 20 mile per hour zones in Roath, to reassign the area as residential streets rather than roads. As a cyclist, my speed hasn’t changed, but my feeling of causing offence to drivers has. I am normally courteous, and pull over to allow them to pass where possible, and I have found most drivers since the change to 20 miles per hour have been courteous back. I am finding this is a great improvement!
    Here is a blog post from World Streets, describing the 20s plenty campaign. it mentions that gardens should be kept as gardens, with the cars parked in the road to help slow the traffic down.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s