The good, the bad, and the ugly.
And the excellent . . .
Exhibit (Five hundred photos): https://goo.gl/UgeuWD
– Bibliography compiled by Dr David Ness, School of Natural and Built Environments 13 July 2017
The modern view of a circular economy differs from the past. It has started in the second half of the 20th Century and is a case for the simultaneous and uncorrelated emergence of an idea
Note: The concept, the tool set, the experience thus far, the critical analysis, and the potential associated with “Circular Economy” will be examined and shared in a cycle of articles here in World Streets — with the specific objective of seeing how this policy approach can be put to work to open up new understanding and opportunities in the challenging push to sustainable mobility, sustainable cities and sustainable lives. (Leave no stone unturned.)
In a conversation about one of the critical issues and decision points being set out in my forthcoming collaborative book, “BETTER CHOICES: Bringing Sustainable Transport to Your City” — namely the fundamental structural importance of the climate/transport link — I was told yesterday by a well-placed person in Malaysia that no one in Penang or indeed Malaysia (or for that matter pretty much anywhere else on our gasping planet) takes climate change seriously. At least sufficiently seriously to even consider changing their daily transport choices (which it just happens is what my book is all about.).
This year’s program combines site visits, brainstorming sessions, conferences, presentations and vigorous questioning, looking, listening and co-learning with my esteemed long time Taiwanese friends and colleagues.from 22 September to 4 October. Among the main events and presentations:
* * Click map for higher definition version * *
The above map reports the locations of 561 readers checking into World Streets over the last five days. (Of our total 4,244 registered readers as of this date.)
But what about them? Where are they coming from? And what do they read?
“Old Mobility” – the world that most of us know best — with its drumbeat stress on steadily increasing supply, more vehicles, higher speeds, longer distances and more space-hogging infrastructure as the auto-pilot, unexamined answer to our urban mobility problems — has with very few exceptions been the favored path for decision-making and investment in the sector over the last 70 years.
It is well-known and easy to see where it is leading. Aggressing the planet, costing us a bundle, draining the world’s petroleum reserves, and delivering poor service for the transport majority. It’s time to learn from the best of the rest, the several hundred cities on our gasping planet, many of them in Europe, that are showing the way for the rest. None of even the best are perfect. Each is struggling in its own way. But they are trying and that is what responsible governance and participatory democracy is all about.
City and EcoPlan cooperate to create new model for sustainable transport in Third World cities