From Streetsblog: Uber’s Making Traffic Worse

Uber’s Own Numbers Show It’s Making Traffic Worse

Photo: Wikipedia

Uber blasted out an Excel spreadsheet to reporters this morning, accompanied by a story and editorial in the Daily News, with data providing a snapshot of how many Uber vehicles are on Manhattan streets south of 59th Street, New York’s central business district. While Uber claims the data shows its vehicles aren’t responsible for congestion in the city core, transportation analyst Charles Komanoff has crunched Uber’s own numbers and estimates that the service has actually reduced traffic speeds in the central business district by about 8 percent.

– – – >  Full text of original available here

Photo: Wikipedia

Uber’s data dump [XLS] released hourly information on the number of pickups and drivers below 59th Street and in the rest of the city between May 31 and July 19. It used that data to calculate the number of Uber vehicles in the central business district, where half of the company’s trips originate. Between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., there were an average of 1,904 Uber cars on the road below 59th Street.

That seems like a small number at first glance, and Uber highlights that fact by proclaiming it “is not the source of Manhattan congestion.” But the question isn’t whether Uber is the root cause of all congestion — it’s whether Uber is making the current traffic situation worse.

So how do 1,904 for-hire cars circulating the congested Manhattan core actually affect traffic? To answer the question, Streetsblog turned to Komanoff, whose “Balanced Transportation Analyzer” [XLS] models the impact of toll proposals and other changes to city traffic. Uber’s data release provides more detailed information than what was previously available to the public.

The volume of Ubers is similar to the 2,000 yellow taxi medallions the Bloomberg administration proposed to auction off in 2012, which Komanoff calculated would make average traffic speeds 12 percent worse. To understand what happens to Manhattan traffic with 1,900 Ubers in the mix, Komanoff adjusted his model in a couple of key ways to account for the fact that each Uber vehicle likely affects Manhattan traffic less than each yellow cab.

He assumes that while Uber trips cover as much distance as yellow taxi trips, the app-based vehicles cruise half as much as yellows, which spend about 35 percent of their total miles looking for fares. He also assumes that a quarter of Uber trips would otherwise have been taken as yellow cabs.

Even with those tweaks in Uber’s favor, Komanoff estimates that having 1,900 Ubers in the city’s core between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. reduces average travel speeds by 7.7 percent. Without the favorable assumptions, that number jumps to 12 percent.

“Uber is entering a system of vehicles — cars, trucks, cabs, buses — which had settled into a more or less stable level of congestion. The Uber vehicles perturb that system,” Komanoff wrote.

Uber “isn’t totally wrong” to claim that it is not responsible for Manhattan congestion, Komanoff noted. “But that’s the wrong question,” he wrote. “The question before the City Council is: Is Uber the source (or a leading source) of the increase in Manhattan congestion? The answer is assuredly: Yes.”

NYC taxi jam

# # #

About the author:

stephen miller streesblogStephen Miller reports for Streetsblog NYC, where he covers livable streets and transportation issues in the city and the region. He joined Streetsblog in 2012, covering the tail end of the Bloomberg administration and the launch of Citi Bike. Since then, he has covered mayoral elections, the de Blasio administration’s ongoing Vision Zero campaign, and New York City’s ever-evolving street safety and livable streets movements. Stephen graduated from Cornell University with a degree in urban and regional studies and is currently studying for his Master’s in City and Regional Planning at Pratt Institute.

# # #

About Streetsblog:

streetsblog - logoStreetsblog is a daily news source connecting people to information about sustainable transportation and livable communities. Since 2006, Streetsblog has covered the movement to transform our cities by reducing dependence on private automobiles and improving conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders. Our reporters have broken important stories about transit funding, pedestrian safety, and bicycle policy from day one. And our writing makes arcane topics like parking prices and induced traffic accessible to a broad audience.

# # #

About the editor:

Eric Britton
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France

Bio: Trained as a development economist, Eric Britton is a public entrepreneur specializing in the field of sustainability and social justice. Professor of Sustainable Development, Economy and Democracy at the Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Paris), he is also MD of EcoPlan Association, an independent advisory network providing strategic counsel for government and business on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change and sustainable development. Founding editor of World Streets, his latest work focuses on the subject of equity, economy and efficiency in city transport and public space, and helping governments to ask the right questions -- and in the process, find practical solutions to urgent climate, mobility, life quality and job creation issues. More at: http://wp.me/PsKUY-2p7

View complete profile

 

2 thoughts on “From Streetsblog: Uber’s Making Traffic Worse

  1. This seems like a small number at first glance and that fact by proclaiming it is not the source of Manhattan congestion. But more questions comes that isn’t whether Uber is the root cause of all congestion. Whose really making the current traffic situation worse.?

    Reply
  2. At first blush a reduction in speed of motor vehicles in NYC midtown area is probably a good thing for pedestrians and cyclists. But the service does provide a transportation option that has a big footprint in a part of town that is already very dense. And, Uber takes advantage of the poor ability of municipal taxi regime to provide extra capacity at peak periods, since the medallion system makes every cab a full-time operator, rather than the need for part-time cars. But this leads to simply proving even more one-occupant (not counting the driver) cars at the very time of the day when you want travelers to reduce their footprint.

    One way to do that is through Uber’s Uber-Pool service, which allows several fares to share a cab, something that NYC mandated during WWII when fuel and tires were in limited supply. With Uber’s handheld apps, they should be able to easily handle the splitting of the overall fare between the unrelated people sharing the car.

    In fact, what I am waiting to see is for people transporting themselves in own their car being able to accept ride requests via an app that knows where the person is to be picked up, handles the identity/security, and does the billing. But it will require the participating drivers to file their destination for it to work properly and make it truly ridesharing (the term Uber uses improperly: ridesharing means the driver can recover only his car costs less his own share, not any salary for his time, since he, too, is being transported.).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s