Home Location , Smart Growth and Sustainable Transport: Changing Patterns

A significant key to sustainable transport resides in our land use. And what more important land use decision than where we chose to live, the place in which we start or end the lion’s share of our personal travel each day? In this article our guest Todd Litman of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute sheds judicious light on claims and counter-claims of Smart Growth, as true in Delhi, Moscow or Cape Town as in North America.

Where We Want To Be:
Home Location Preferences And Their Implications For Smart Growth

Smart growth consists of more compact, accessible, multi-modal community development. This can provide numerous benefits to residents who live in such areas and society overall. Critics claim that most consumers dislike this type of community and so are harmed by public policies that encourage it. This analysis suggests otherwise.

Although market surveys indicate that most North American households preferred single-family homes, they also indicate strong and growing consumer preference for smart growth features such as accessibility and modal options (reflected as short commutes and convenient walkability to local services). Twenty years ago less than a third of households preferred smart growth, but this is projected to increase to two thirds of households within two decades.

This reflects various demographic and economic trends, including aging population, rising fuel prices, and increased health and environmental concerns. In addition, suburban lifestyles and automobile travel have become less glamorous. An increasing portion of consumers now aspire to urban lifestyles for at least part of their lifecycle, and the housing market correction in 2008 spoiled confidence in suburban real estate investments. Households are likely to be more rational and cautious in the future.

Described differently, for a few decades consumer housing and transportation decisions seemed to defy basic rules of economics. Housing location decisions seemed insensitive to transportation cost factors such as commute distance and fuel prices, resulting in dispersed housing and automobile-dependent lifestyles. Walking, cycling and public transit were dismissed as inferior and undesirable modes, even where they are efficient and cost effective. Increasing congestion, fuel prices, health and environmental concerns causes consumers to be more rational. Some embrace this opportunity while others react with fear.

This is not to suggest that automobile travel and suburban living will end. Under even aggressive smart growth policies most North Americans will continue to live in single-family houses, although a greater portion will be small-lot, attached housing such as townhouses.

However, the demand for new housing is likely to shift dramatically. The current stock of large-lot, single-family houses in exurban locations currently exceeds demand, causing prices to plummet and foreclosures to rise. At best, it will take years for such homes to regain their 2005 market value (in real, inflation-adjusted terms). More likely, consumer demand for such housing will never fully recover.

On the other hand, the market for small-lot, attached housing in accessible, multi-modal communities is strong. Such housing has maintained its value and demand is projected to increase significantly in the future due to structural demographic and economic trends. Communities and developers that respond to these market shifts can succeed. Those that continue past policies are likely to fare poorly.

This is good news overall since more compact, accessible, multi-modal housing can provide many benefits to consumers and society. It gives consumers better options and greater efficiency.

Smart growth residents benefit directly from time savings, financial savings, and increased safety and health. Society benefits from infrastructure cost savings, improved opportunity for disadvantaged populations, and improved environmental quality.

Claims that smart growth deprives consumers of preferred housing options are clearly inaccurate. Sprawl housing is now abundantly available at discounted prices, while smart growth housing is scarce in many regions, which drives up prices, making it unaffordable to the lower income households that need it most. Sprawl results, in part, from planning and market distortions that favor dispersed development and automobile travel.

There are many reasons to correct these distortions and support smart growth. Such reforms will result in land use development patterns that better reflect consumer preferences.

# # #

* A complete report on this report is available from the VTPI at http://www.vtpi.org/sgcp.pdf (36 pp.)

Further reading:

Laurence Aurbach (2006), The Market for Mixed Use & Walkability, PedShed

Belden, Russonello and Stewart (2004) American Community Survey, National Association of Realtors (www.realtor.org) and Smart Growth America (www.smartgrowthamerica.org); at http://www.brspoll.com/Reports/Smart%20Growth.pdf.

David Berson, David Lereah, Paul Merski, Frank Nothaft, and David Seiders (2006), America’s Home Forecast: The Next Decade for Housing and Mortgage Finance, Homeownership Alliance (www.freddiemac.com); at http://www.freddiemac.com/news/pdf/americas_home_forecast.pdf.

Robert Burchell, et al (2002), The Costs of Sprawl – 2000, TCRP Report 74, TRB (www.trb.org); at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_74-a.pdf.

Robert Burchell, Anthony Downs, Barbara McCann and Sahan Mukherji (2005), Sprawl Costs: Economic Impacts of Unchecked Development, Island Press (www.islandpress.org).

Cambridge Systematics (2009), Moving Cooler: Transportation Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions (www.movingcooler.info); summary at http://commerce.uli.org/misc/movingcoolerexecsum.pdf.

Gerald Carlino, Satyajit Chatterjee, and Robert Hunt (2006), Urban Density and the Rate of Invention, WP 06-14, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (www.philadelphiafed.org); at http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/regional-economy/regionalresearch/ index.cfm?tab=3.

CDC (2005), Designing and Building Healthy Places, U.S. Center for Disease Control

Patrick M. Condon (2004), Canadian Cities American Cities: Our Differences Are the Same, Funders Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities (www.fundersnetwork.org/usr_doc/Patrick_Condon_Primer.pdf).

Joe Cortright (2008), Driven to the Brink: How the Gas Price Spike Popped the Housing Bubble and Devalued the Suburbs, CEOs for Cities (www.ceosforcities.org); at

Wendell Cox (2001), Smart Growth: Retarding the Quality of Life, Demographia
(www.demographia.com); at http://www.demographia.com/dib-smg.htm.

CTOD and CNT (2006), The Affordability Index: A New Tool for Measuring the True
Affordability of a Housing Choice, Center for Transit-Oriented Development and the Center for Neighborhood Technology (http://htaindex.cnt.org); at http://www.brookings.edu/metro/umi/20060127_affindex.pdf.

Decisions Data (1994), Puget Sound Housing Preference Study, Puget Sound Regional Council (www.psrc.org).

DOC (1996), Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050, Department of Commerce; at http://www.census.gov/prod/1/pop/p25-1130.pdf.

Conor Dougherty (2009), “In the Exurbs, the American Dream Is Up for Rent,” Wall Street Journal, 31 March 2009; at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123845433832571407.html.

Mark Eppli and Charles C. Tu (2000), Valuing the New Urbanism; The Impact of New Urbanism on Prices of Single-Family Homes, Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org).

Pierre Filion, Trudi Bunting and Keith Warriner (1999), “Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City” Urban Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 1317-4

William H. Frey (2009), Big City Populations Survive the Housing Crunch, Brookings Institution (www.brookings.edu); at http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0701_housing_frey.aspx.

Reid Ewing, Keith Bartholomew, Steve Winkelman, Jerry Walters and Don Chen (2007),
Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change, Urban Land
Institute and Smart Growth America (www.smartgrowthamerica.org/gcindex.html).

Reid Ewing (2007), “The Demand For Smart Growth: What Survey Research Tell Us,” Planning, American Planning Association; at http://www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/pdf/Research_Dec07.pdf.

David Goldberg, Jim Chapman, Lawrence Frank, Sarah Kavage and Barbara McCann (2006), New Data for a New Era: A Summary of the SMARTRAQ Findings; Linking Land Use,
Transportation, Air Quality and Health in the Atlanta Region, SmartTraq (www.act-trans.ubc.ca) and Smart Growth America (www.smartgrowthamerica.org); at http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/SMARTRAQSummary_000.pdf.

Peter M. Haas, Carrie Makarewicz, Albert Benedict, Thomas W. Sanchez and Casey J. Dawkins (2006), Housing & Transportation Cost Trade-offs and Burdens of Working Households in 28 Metros, Center for Neighborhood Technology (www.cnt.org); at http://www.cnt.org/repository/H-TTradeoffs-for-Working-Families-n-28-Metros-FULL.pdf.

Susan Handy (2008), “Is Support For Traditionally Designed Communities Growing?,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 209-221.

Bennet Heart and Jennifer Biringer (2000), The Smart Growth – Climate Change Connection, Conservation Law Foundation (www.tlcnetwork.org).

John D. Hunt (2001), A Stated Preference Analysis of Sensitivities to Elements of Transportation and Urban Form, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (www.trb.org); at http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jabraham/Papers/ecv4trbhunt/ECV4TRBHunt.PDF.

IEDC (2006), Economic Development and Smart Growth: Case Studies on the Connections
Between Smart Growth Development and Jobs, Wealth, and Quality of Life, International
Economic Development Council (www.iedconline.org); at L. Jiang and B. C. O’Neill (2007), “Impacts Of Demographic Trends On US Household Size And Structure,” Population and Development Review, 33, No. 3, pp. 567-591; at

Robert E. Lang (2005), “Valuing the Suburbs: Why Some ‘Improvements’ Lower Home Prices,” Opolis, Vol.1, No.1 (www.mi.vt.edu/uploads/Opolis/Lang.pdf), pp. 5-12.
Christopher B. Leinberger (2008), “The Next Slum,” Atlantic Monthly, March 2008; at

Jonathan Levine (2006), Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use, Resources for the Future (www.rff.org).

Jonathan Levine, Aseem Inam, Richard Werbel and Gwo-Wei Torng (2002), Land Use and
Transportation Alternatives: Constraint or Expansion of Household Choice?, Mineta
Transportation Institute, Report 01-19 (www.transweb.sjsu.edu/publications/01-19.pdf).

Jonathan Levine and Lawrence D. Frank (2006), “Transportation And Land-Use Preferences And Residents’ Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency Of Compact Development In The Atlanta Region,” Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 6 (www.springerlink.com), November 2006.

Michael Lewyn (2005), “How Overregulation Creates Sprawl (Even in a City without Zoning),” Wayne Law Review, Vol. 50, p. 1171; at http://ssrn.com/abstract=837244.

Michael Lewyn (2006), “Five Myths About Sprawl,” Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal,
(http://ssrn.com/abstract=931251), 2006.

Michael Lewyn (2009), A Fable About Sprawl, Planetizen Blog (www.planetizen.com/node/39789). Todd Litman (1995), “Land Use Impact Costs of Transportation,” originally published in World
Transport Policy & Practice, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 9-16; at http://www.vtpi.org/landuse.pdf.

Todd Litman (2002), Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability, VTPI
(www.vtpi.org); at http://www.vtpi.org/park-hou.pdf.

Todd Litman (2003), “Integrating Public Health Objectives in Transportation Decision-Making,” American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 18, No. 1 (www.healthpromotionjournal.com), Sept./Oct. 2003, pp. 103-108; at http://www.vtpi.org/AJHP-litman.pdf.

Todd Litman (2004), Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth, VTPI (www.vtpi.org); at

Todd Litman (2005), The Future Isn’t What It Used To Be, VTPI (www.vtpi.org); at
http://www.vtpi.org/future.pdf; published as “Changing Travel Demand: Implications for Transport Planning,” ITE Journal, Vol. 76, No. 9, (www.ite.org), September, pp. 27-33.

Todd Litman (2006), Understanding Smart Growth Savings, VTPI (www.vtpi.org); at

Todd Litman (2007), Smart Growth Reforms: Changing Planning, Regulatory and Fiscal
Practices to Support More Efficient Land Use, VTPI (www.vtpi.org); at http://www.vtpi.org/smart_growth_reforms.pdf.

Gregg Logan, Stephanie Siejka and Shyam Kannan (2007), The Market For Smart Growth,
Robert Charles Lesser and Company (www.rclco.com).

William Lucy (2002), Danger in Exurbia: Outer Suburbs More Dangerous Than Cities,
University of Virginia (www.virginia.edu); summarized in

William H. Lucy and Jeff Herlitz (2009), Foreclosures in States and Metropolitan Areas: Patterns, Forecasts, and Pricing Toxic Assets, University of Virginia (www.virginia.edu); at http://www.virginia.edu/uvatoday/pdf/foreclosures_2009.doc.

Eric Miller (2004), Travel and Housing Costs in the Greater Toronto Area: 1986-1996, Neptis Foundation (www.neptis.org).

Joseph Molinaro (2003), Higher Density, Mixed-Use, Walkable Neighborhoods – Do Interested Customers Exist?, National Association Of Realtors (www.realtor.org).

Anne Vernez Moudon and Paul Mitchell Hess (2000), “Suburban Clusters: The Nucleation of Multifamily Housing in Suburban Areas of the Central Puget Sound,” Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 66, No. 3 (www.planning.org), Summer 2000, pp. 243-264.

Mark Muro and Robert Puentes (2004), Investing In A Better Future: A Review Of The Fiscal And Competitive Advantages Of Smarter Growth Development Patterns, Brookings Institute (www.brookings.edu).

Dowell Myers and Elizabeth Gearin (2001), “Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments,” Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 12, Issue 4, Fannie Mae Foundation (www.mi.vt.edu/web/page/580/sectionid/580/pagelevel/1/interior.asp).

NAR and NAHB (2002), Joint Survey: Survey Suggests Market-Based Vision of Smart Growth, National Association of Realtors and National Association of Home Builders (www.realtor.org).

NAHB (1999), Consumer Survey on Growth Issues, National Association of Home Builders

Arthur C. Nelson (2006), “Leadership in a New Era,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 4 (www.planning.org); at

Arthur C. Nelson (2009), The New Urbanity: The Rise of a New America, University of Utah Metropolitan Research Center; summary at http://www.froogalizer.com/news/research-onhomeownership-rate-through-2030.html. Also see The Next $40 Trillion: Texas Trends

Arthur C. Nelson, Rolf Pendall, Casy Dawkins and Gerrit Knaap (2002), The Link Between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy (www.brook.edu); at

Randal O’Toole (2001), “The Folly of ‘Smart Growth’,” Regulation, Cato Institute
(www.cato.org); at http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv24n3/otoole.pdf.

Nick Paumgarten (2007), “There and Back Again: The Soul Of The Commuter,” The New Yorker (www.newyorker.com), 16 April 2007, pp. 58-70.

PEW (2009), For Nearly Half of America, Grass Is Greener Somewhere Else, Pew Research
Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, (www.pewsocialtrends.org); at

PFBE (2007), Valuing Sustainable Urbanism: Measuring & Valuing New Approaches to
Residentially Led Mixed Use Growth, The Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment

Alan Pisarski (2009), ULI Moving Cooler Report: Greenhouse Gases, Exaggerations and
Misdirections, New Geography (www.newgeography.com); at http://www.newgeography.com/content/00932-

John Pitkin and Dowell Meyers (2008), U.S. Housing Trends: Generational Changes and the Outlook to 2050, for Special Report 298, Driving And The Built Environment: The Effects Of Compact Development On Motorized Travel, Energy Use, And CO2 Emissions, TRB (www.trb.org); at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr298pitkin-myers.pdf.

Pnina O. Plaut (2006), “Intra-Household Choices Regarding Commuting and Housing,”
Transportation Research A, Vol. 40, Issue 7 (www.elsevier.com/locate/tra), August, pp. 561-571.

PPIC (2002), Special Survey on Land Use: Part of the Growth, Land Use and Environment
Series, Public Policy Institute of California (www.ppic.org).

RCLCO (2008), Measuring the Market for Green Residential Development, Robert Charles
Lesser and Company (www.rclco.com); at http://www.rclco.com/pdf/Measuring_the_Market.pdf.

Reconnecting America (2004), Hidden In Plain Sight: Capturing The Demand For Housing Near Transit, Center for Transit-Oriented Development; Reconnecting America
(www.reconnectingamerica.org) for the Federal Transit Administration (www.fta.dot.gov); at http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/pdfs/Ctod_report.pdf.

Reconnecting America (2008), Capturing the Value of Transit, Reconnecting America
(www.reconnectingamerica.org); at http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/public/projects/318.

Tim Schwanen and Patricia L. Mokhtarian (2005), “What Affects Commute Mode Choice:
Neighborhood Physical Structure Or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods?” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, pp. 83–99; at http://www.uctc.net/papers/732.pdf.

SGN (2002 and 2004), Getting To Smart Growth: 100 Policies for Implementation, and Getting to Smart Growth II: 100 More Policies for Implementation, Smart Growth Network (www.smartgrowth.org) and International City/County Management Association
(www.icma.org); at http://www.epa.gov/dced/getting_to_sg2.htm.

Sierra Club (2005), Healthy Growth Calculator: Where Do You Want to Live?, Sierra Club (www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/density/choose_density.asp).

SMARTRAQ (2007), Metro Atlanta Community Preference Survey, Georgia Institute of
Technology (www.act-trans.ubc.ca/smartraq/pages).

John Stillich and Sandeep Kumar Agrawal (2008), Housing Alternatives Acceptability Study (HAAS), Sustainable Urban Development Association (www.trialsudasite.citymax.com); at

Thomas J. Sugrue (2009), “The New American Dream: Renting,” Wall Street Journal, 14 August 2009 (http://online.wsj.com/article /SB10001424052970204409904574350432677038184.html )

John V. Thomas (2009), Residential Construction Trends in America’s Metropolitan Regions, Development, Community, and Environment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (www.epa.gov); at http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/metro_res_const_trends_09.pdf.

TRB (2009), Driving and the Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on
Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2 Emissions, Special Report 298, Transportation Research Board (www.trb.org); at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr298prepub.pdf.

ULI (Annual Reports), Emerging Trends in Real Estate, Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org); at http://www.uli.org/ResearchAndPublications/EmergingTrends/Americas.aspx.
US Census (2001), Historical Census of Housing Tables: Units in Structure, U.S. Census (www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html).

US Census (2008), American Housing Survey for the United States: 2007, USHUD and Census Bureau (www.census.gov); at http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/h150-07.pdf.
US Census (2008), Families, by Presence of Own Children Under 18: 1950 to Present, U.S. Census (www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2008.html).

David Villano (2009), “The Slumming Of Suburbia: The Poor Are Fleeing Our Cities, But Life Is Not Always Greener, Even When Affordable Housing Comes With A Two-Car Garage,” Miller-M cCune (www.miller-mccune.com); at http://www.miller-mccune.com/business_economics/theslumming-of-suburbia-994.

VTPI (2006), Online TDM Encyclopedia, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org).

Alex Wilson (2007), “Driving to Green Buildings: The Transportation Energy Intensity of Building,” Environmental Building News (www.buildinggreen.com), Vol. 16, No. 9, Sept. 2007; at http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm?fileName=160901a.xml.

Eric Weiss (2008), “Gas Prices Apply Brakes To Suburban Migration,” Washington Post, 5 August 2008; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/04/AR2008080402415.html.

# # #

Todd Litman is founder and executive director of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, an independent research organization dedicated to developing innovative solutions to transport problems. His work helps to expand the range of impacts and options considered in transportation decision-making, improve evaluation techniques, and make specialized technical concepts accessible to a larger audience. He can be reached at: 1250 Rudlin Street, Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, Canada. Email: litman@vtpi.org. Phone & Fax: +1 250-360-1560

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s