Rural carshare project – A thinking exercise & Invitation for comment

rural carshare cowWe keep reading and are repeatedly informed that for carsharing to work there must be good public transport, cycling and other mobility arrangements as indispensable complements. In other words, for carsharing to work you have to be not only in a city, but in a certain kind of city. This position has been an article of faith for many carshare observers for more than a decade, and while there is a certain logic to it, upon inspection it turns out  there is a lot more to successful carsharing than that.

This is a draft working paper from our joint 2014  Going Dutch  Carshare Strategies program for the Dutch government’s KpVV,  for which you will find a detailed menu and links  in the upper left  menu here.

Let us put our heads together and run an informal thinking exercise and take a look at how carsharing might work not in a city but in a less than affluent rural community where there is close to zero public transport along with a notable absence of other ways of getting around, other than owning and driving a car.

Now such a sparsely settled outlying rural space is quite obviously not a place in which Zipcar, Hertz on Demand or car2go are likely to show up tomorrow morning and negotiate with the village elders for a new service. So if we wish to figure out how to do some low-cost efficient carsharing in our rural community, we are just going to have to get down and do it on our own.

We are targeting here a specifically rural carshare operation, but similar sharing arrangements have been around for decades, in many places and in surprisingly large numbers (though the statistics are poor on these off-the-record private sharing arrangements). They are generally referred to as informal, private, cooperative or neighborhood carshare operations. But let us stick with our simple rural  example for now.

What about this to get us started?

In one variant, three or four neighboring families get together and together obtain a used car in reasonably good condition, taking advantage at this point in 2014 of exceptionally low prices in the used car market. If we take the Netherlands for example, it should be easily possible to find a midrange used car in reasonably good shape for something on the order of €2000, possibly less.

That gives us a first point of departure for our rural carshare project. In our test case a small handful of  individuals or families get together and each one puts in, say, €500.  Or alternatively they will use a vehicle which  that of the parties already owns.  So now  we already have (a) our sharing group and (b) our car. (There may be a wrinkle that will need attention in terms of joint ownership, but I doubt that would be a problem in most places.)

Next we will need an operational protocol which clearly spells out the conditions of use of each of the owners/authorized drivers. This will best certainly take the form of a legal contract which specifies one by one all of the areas of responsibility and use. (There are numerous examples  of such protocols  so there is no need to start from scratch.)

As part of this  and most importantly  we need to give our attention to insurance, and for the purposes of our model let us assume that we find an insurance company willing to provide insurance for the ownership group at a reasonable rate. (Since these kinds of arrangements exist in more places than one might think, it would be reasonable to assume that with a bit of research it will be possible to find our cooperating insurer.)

The next step will be to define the supporting system, the process of reservation. This can be done manually, though better will be the use of social media and/or any of the simple carshare reservation schemes which are available either free or at low cost.

So  as a sign-in member of the group I can now have a car (“my car”, kind of) at my disposal at a reasonable level of cost and can make a reservation from, let us say, Thursday noon until 1800 hrs. on the same day, on the understanding that the vehicle will be returned in good condition and in a timely manner to our agreed parking area. (Something which will be costless or close to it given the fact that we are dealing with lightly settled areas.)

This is often as a class referred to as  “private carsharing”, and since there are few known statistics on it at this point, it remains to be seen how it might be better known in the future, with the thought that if it is carefully done it would represent a public asset which can only profit from wise public attention and support.

For now in the carsharing world all eyes are turned on “classic” carsharing along the model which has dominated over the last 20 years, and more recently one-way carsharing and P2P (peer-to-peer or person to person). But private carsharing is going to be an important player in the future, so now seems like a good time to begin to organize our thoughts and policies on it.  And here is where national and local government can be ready to step in and lend a hand. If . . . they have worked out a strategy.

 If you wish to get a running start  and dig deeper into  the details of setting up  an informal carshare operation,  you may wish to have a look at Carplus UK’s Guidance Note of May 2012 “Running an  informal car club’ which is available at http://goo.gl/bYhGE2. Another excellent reference is the Belgian informal carshare group Autopedia:  http://www.autopartage.be/p_228.htm.

Some other thoughts:

Only rural?  Of course not. We have chosen to take the rural setting as our point of departure for this recommendation since we finally have here a mobility option that can work in these needful places. (See the Neighborhood Car concept in Germany and other parts of Europe and North America for use in other settings.)

P2P: This objective of a rural carshare or , if you prefer, neighborhood car be adequately or better served by P2P ? Could well  be, so there is every reason that this option should also be checked out .

Environmental impacts: What about the negative environmental impacts of one more old car circulating on the road system and as such adding to the overall pollution load of the transport system? This needs to be taken into consideration from a public policy perspective, but there is nothing like a bit of research and some solid numbers to take an informed position on this important question. Off the top of my head, my guess is that given all the potential benefits, this is unlikely to be a deciding factor. But let us let the research work this one out.

Ridesharing potential: Here is another hunch: when it becomes known in the small community that there is a new means of mobility available, it would seem likely that there will be significant potential for ride sharing to develop around the basic model. The word gets out, the car is there for all to see, and the software exists to combine the carsharing and ridesharing functions quite neatly. Again, good policy counsel and guidelines from government and the research community can certainly play a role in making this happen.

Equity: What are the kinds of people and communities who are likely to benefit from the development of new forms of affordable mobility in outlying areas? They will in the main be poorer rather than richer. Older rather than younger.  Less rather than more educated.   Cut off from public services and enjoyable day-to-day experiences and transactions because there is simply no way for them to access them conveniently and affordably.(1)  For excellent reasons why the Going Dutch project in its next stages should be giving attention to these private options as well as to more conventional forms of carsharing .

The role of government: A fair number of the 406 municipalities in the Netherlands are rural and lightly settled. And hard to serve by traditional public transport means. Moreover, it would seem reasonable to guess that few of these key local government units are at present prepared to take an active role in encouraging rural carsharing, in large part because it is not familiar to them.  However since we now know that the key actor in encouraging and supporting more and better carsharing is local government, this looks like something that is worth looking into more closely within the current program. The role of national government in turn is to help  local government to be fully informed as to the advantages and ways of going about creating more and better carsharing.

Next steps: This rough exercise is being  distributed to the number of colleagues in different countries who have better hands-on knowledge of different kinds of carsharing operations and the bit of luck we will be able to factor in their more solid information to add an important sections of the in-process “Going Dutch” project.

(1)  If we bear in mind that the typical  carsharer  in most parts of the world until now  have had  a quite different access and mobility profile from that which we can expect to find expect to find in rural areas: i.e., the studies show that they are typically relatively young, relatively well-off, relatively well-educated  and more likely than not living in a place in which many of their daily shopping and service requirements are close at hand and which offers  relatively good levels of public transit,  cycling  and other  non-car access.

# # #

Reader Comment:

Alan Woodland, 20 March 2014

If the people sharing the car formed a co-operative, the costs of vehicle ownership could be shared within this entity. An advantage to the co-operative structure is that the online booking system at www.carshareverywhere.net (developed by Modo Co-operative) can be made available to small co-ops with less than 10 vehicles at no cost.

# # #

The editor:

Just to be sure, this is a pure thinking  and sharing exercise, and is not intended in the form you see it here as anything more than that.  Fortunately for anyone who wishes to dig deeper, there is a considerable body of  experience and information available to the diligent researcher or planner  that can help fill in the many blanks  that appear here .

And in the event, there is nothing particularly new about private or informal carsharing, although it is difficult to  appreciate its exact extent given that  these are the kinds of  relationships and transactions that  rarely if ever get picked up by  the statistics.  What good government can bring to this ongoing phenomenon is  to help make available reliable information on key issues and  means of making these arrangements  more effective  and more numerous.  It also may turn out upon study that  other forms of support might also be called on,  in order to  help facilitate  affordable and efficient transportation options for groups and areas that today are not fairly served.  But all that will come out of the preparatory studies and analysis.

Some references:

* Autopia, Belgium – http://www.autopartage.be/p_228.htm
* Carplus UK –  “Running an  informal car club’ -  http://goo.gl/bYhGE2.

# # #

 

CROW/KpVV:  (Kennisplatform Verkeer en Vervoer –Knowledge Platform for Mobility and Transport). Supports local and regional authorities in their efforts to develop and implement mobility and transport policy by providing practical know-how, reports, guidelines, meetings, and networks.

 

EcoPlan: An independent advisory network and NGO providing strategic counsel for government and industry in the areas of economic development, sustainable transport and sustainable cities. Publisher of World Streets: the Politics of Transport in Cities.

Eric Britton
9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France

Bio: Trained as a development economist, Eric Britton is MD of EcoPlan International, an independent advisory network providing strategic counsel for government, business and civil society on policy and decision issues involving complex systems, social-technical change and sustainable development. His forthcoming book, “Toward a General Theory of Transport in Cities”, is being presented, discussed and critiqued in a series of international conferences, master classes, workshops and media events over 2014. (More at http://wp.me/PsKUY-2p7)

View complete profile

 
About these ads

11 thoughts on “Rural carshare project – A thinking exercise & Invitation for comment

  1. Interesting thought-challenge:

    1. Rural demographics are different, but their facility with sharing is higher. They don’t need the internet to be part of a local community and to be aware of others’ needs and advantages.

    2, The example assumes a group of people _buying_ a car, but it is more likely that they would, as a first step, find a way to share the ones they already have, perhaps when one of the four families is considering replacing their car, and musing about how the _four_ households could
    get by with _three_ cars.

    3. Because they lack local taxi, transit, or delivery services, they might consider allowing the shared cars to be used for these, too — the _same_ car (as opposed to urban model where a car is permanently used for one of them, all painted up). For instance, a vehicle used to deliver pizzas during the dinner hour can be used as a grocery shopping “bus” for seniors in mid-day.

    4. Because of small scale of settlements, bikes could become a bigger ‘actor.’ Private car ownership tends to make the owner use a car for _every_ trip, regardless of how long (short) or how much (little) ‘cargo’ needs to be transported, but in a shared-car community, I can see cargo, tandem, & folding bikes being shared as well. And why not RVs (another underused vehicle type; a few weeks a year).

    Reply
  2. As far as I am concerned the prime motivation for developing carsharing in rural areas is to facilitate the provision of conventional (or demand responsive) public transport.

    As carsharers are more likely to use the car as the mode of last resort (i.e. only when other modes are unavailable) they are therefore likely customers for buses that are well timed for journeys to work, shopping or to connect with the longer distance network.

    Reply
  3. thanks for sharing the rural car share discussion with me. Some thoughts:

    In the uk we normally say that we are 80% urban and 20% rural so we need to kep our eyes on both segments

    In rural England there is still a lot to do to improve all the options to car ownership and kill-off the idea that care use/car share is the only option eg rural buses, community transport, inserting walk and cycle infrastrucure where it is absent

    There will still be a strong role for rural car share but I would want to see this integrated with other options and avoid the usual right-wing, free market garbage we have to put up with. In rural England there is a huge fault line between group A and group B

    group A: the car is the only option, cut all bus services, make car parking free because a a car parking charge is a tax on rural residents, build more roads

    group B: we can shift a lot of car journeys to walk and cycle, we should fund community transport and things like the Wiltshire Wigglybus, we need many more miles of off-road bike and pedestrian tracks, all schools in rural areas should have totally safe pedestrian access routes covering average walking distances to schools

    I can see car share fitting in well with group B but it lends support to group A and that is how it will be managed in this country

    John

    Reply
  4. Agree with John — carshare can be promoted either as a means of making access to cars affordable to more people or as an alternative to car ownership under which subscribers would use other modes most of the time but would have access to cars when there was really no alternative. We need to do the second.

    But we also need to make major improvements to conventional bus services (i.e. not just community and demand responsive services, though these certainly have a role to play), which really would get a lot more custom especially if people switched to carsharing and used cars only as a mode of last resort, and if they did more to attract visitors from urban areas.

    Off road bike and pedestrian tracks would also help to support public transport by linking up with rail stations and key bus routes,
    and by providing access from stations and key bus routes to nearby visitor attractions (in some cases combined with cycle hire).

    Reply
  5. I’ll be interested if there are workable ideas to bring car sharing to small rural towns in the UK, where parking is difficult and cars are essential due to lack of public transport. I am leading the preparation of a Neighbourhood Plan. New homes come with garages, but these are usually not used for cars. So, too many cars on the streets. Do we provide for more parking spaces, which is what some people call for?
    The alternative is to encourage a small scale car share. But most Parish Councils simply don’t have the capability to build up all the components from scratch. I occurs to me that new homes might come with a requirement for a sum set aside for car sharing, in return for allowing an extra home on the site (in turn facilitated by fewer parking spaces).
    There may be other ideas. But most rural communities will want a model to buy into – rather than engage in the risk of creating something from scratch.

    Reply
    • The team behind this project will be very pleased to swap ideas and information with you on this very promising and until now largely ignored mobility issue.

      CROW/KpVV: (Kennisplatform Verkeer en Vervoer –Knowledge Platform for Mobility and Transport). Supports local and regional authorities in their efforts to develop and implement mobility and transport policy by providing practical know-how, reports, guidelines, meetings, and networks.

      Contact: Friso Metz. Project manager mobiliteits management.
      Jaarbeursplein 22, Utrecht http://www.kpvv.nl T +31 (0)30 291 8209. Skype: kkpvmetz
      Document center: http://www.crow.nl/vakgebieden/verkeer-en-vervoer/bibliotheek

      EcoPlan: An independent advisory network and NGO providing strategic counsel for government and industry in the areas of economic development, sustainable transport and sustainable cities. Publisher of World Streets: the Politics of Transport in Cities.

      Contact: Eric Britton, MD. EcoPlan International. 9, rue Gabillot, 69003 Lyon France
      +336 5088 0787 Skype: newmobility E. eric.britton@ecoplan.org
      Project support: http://worldstreets.wordpress.com/tag/xcar
      [gravatar_profile who="worldstreets"]

      Reply
  6. rwakeford commented on Rural carshare project – A thinking exercise & Invitation for comment

    We keep reading and are repeatedly informed that for carsharing to work there must be good public transport, cycling and …r sharing to small rural towns in the UK, where parking is difficult and cars are essential due to lack of public transport. I am leading the preparation of a Neighbourhood Plan. New homes come with garages, but these are usually not used for cars.

    So, too many cars on the streets. Do we provide for more parking spaces, which is what some people call for?

    The alternative is to encourage a small scale car share. But most Parish Councils simply don’t have the capability to build up all the components from scratch. I occurs to me that new homes might come with a requirement for a sum set aside for car sharing, in return for allowing an extra home on the site (in turn facilitated by fewer parking spaces).

    There may be other ideas. But most rural communities will want a model to buy into – rather than engage in the risk of creating something from scratch

    E-mail: richard.wakeford@ruralstrategy.co.uk

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s