The Transportation Majority. Can’t our politicians count?

Public transport? Cycling? Walking? Car pooling? Car sharing? People stuck at home? Elderly? Handicapped? Poor?  People unable to get to a job? Or who have to take hours to get there and don’t have a choice? Spend my hard-earned money for them? Bah! Who needs it? Why bother if it’s just for a few marginal people? Let’s concentrate our attention and investments on the big problems, those of the majority of people. Us drivers and our cars. We are the transportation majority.

Not so fast! Let’s have a look.

Pity really. In the real world of human mobility there is, as it turns out, no one “big problem”.  And hence no big solutions. There is, for better or worse, just an ever-changing confluence of a very large number of different problems, different people, different desires, different daily life realities, different needs, different constraints, different priorities, different possibilities, and different decisions. And different actions. And different consequences. The kaleidoscope of daily life.

The old mobility vision of society, to which we have been long subject, is essentially a simplified panorama of striding muscled workers, with secure jobs, fixed hours, well-defined trips, leaping into their car and then buckling up for “safe driving”.  Very nice.

All of whom well served by our 20th century “normal transportation arrangements”, that is the huge and hugely expansive infrastructure that we continue to build and repair to support no-choice automotive transportation (and those largely empty cars).

Something like eighty percent of the local transportation funding in most cities of the world goes for that car-supporting infrastructure: roads, bridges, cloverleafs, tunnels, supporting elections, policing, accident prevention, and the long list goes on. Life is sweet.

Then there are “the rest” of us, including: the old, disabled, poor, rural, etc., etc. And of course the old disabled rural poor.

They too of course need to be catered to as well. Fair enough. So let’s give them a bit here and a bit there too. But most of our hard-earned tax money is still going to be spent on providing high quality mobility arrangements for “normal people”. That’s right, isn’t it?

Sorry but no, it’s not at all right. It is in fact 100% wrong. It is wrong because it is grossly unfair and uncivil. And beyond that, it is also based on a false precept. Why?

Because that splendid vision of society with thee and me at the wheel with the wind blowing through our golden hair, simply does not jibe with reality. It never did in the past, and as our societies age it increasingly is absurdly contrary to reality. Here is the surprise, the kicker:

The “transportation majority” is not what most people think, transportation planners and policy makers among them.

The transportation majority are all those of us who increasingly are poorly served by the mainline, no-choice, car-based truncated service arrangements that eat up most of our taxpayer money and take away our choices. And each year, as our populations age this majority grows in numbers.

Here is a generic short-list of the people who make up this till-now all too silent majority:

1. Everyone in your city, country or electorate who does not own or have handy access to a car

2. Everyone who cannot drive

3. Everyone who cannot afford to own and operate a car of their own (And remember that costs a lot of after-tax money)

4. Everyone who should not drive (for reasons of a variety of impediments such as limitations associated with age, psychological state , , , ,)

5. Everyone who lives in a large city and for reasons of density, public health and quality of city life needs to have access to a decent non-car mobility system

6. Everyone who would in fact prefer to get around by walking, cycling or some form of shared transport who cannot safely or readily do so today, because all the money is being spent on the car-based system which is fundamentally, and financially, incompatible with these “softer” and more healthy ways of getting around

7. Everyone who suffers from some form of impairment that makes driving or even access to traditional public transit difficult or impossible

8. Everyone who cannot responsibly take the wheel at any given time (fatigue, distraction, nervousness, some form of intoxication. . . )

9. All those who are today isolated and unable to participate in the life of our communities fully because they simply do not have a decent way to get around.

10. And — don’t lose sight of this! – in a few years you!

How do we work our way out of this? Simple, get out there and vote!

Vote for mayors, counselors and legislators who are ready to work for the transportation majority.

Vote for mayors, counselors and legislators who are ready to join the transportation majority and get to work and around their city by public transport, walking, bicycle, carpool, or carsharing. Or better yet some combination all of the above.

And don’t vote for the other guys.

They will get your message.

# # #

Editor’s note:

Several of our readers have pointed out that while this may be interesting, the only way to make the point is to put numbers to it. Exactly! But this has to be done on a place by place basis, so one can hope that this will be done and that we shall be seeing the results of this important metric here and in many other places.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “The Transportation Majority. Can’t our politicians count?

  1. Agreed! But as long as I need to hurry from place to place to perform the tasks that I do, and live where I live, I am tied to my car. Tote a big pot of soup to the church? Pick up elderly friends for a concert? Bring home supplies for gardening? Pick up and deliver my tenant’s baby for the weekends he has her? Attend a church that is three buses from my home? Granted, I can walk to my bank and grocery store, but to visit a clinic or pharmacy would be a day-long effort without the car. Time is what my car buys me, and variety of life-enhancing possibilities. These are hard choices, given the infrastructure that exists now.

    Reply
    • Thank you Maura. Your points are excellent and clearly set out our challenge in creating a more sustainable — and even better by all measures — transport environment. Nobody ever said it was going to be simple.

      Reply
  2. Perhaps, those that drive and take it for granted should try to walk in the shoes of those that cannot drive, or access a vehicle. They do not get jobs, cannot access the community and are basically shunned as being defective and unskilled – particularly when local politicians also drive and want to further the interests of the auto industry that is dying here anyways. Non-drivers are tired of paying the bills for drivers, which include the roads, the highways, parking, accident clean-up, pollution and so forth. Maybe if those that can drive and have access to a car should pay the full freight of their privilege; perhaps, then they will learn what it is like to have to pay more a third of one’s income on just getting around in a community that does not support public transit.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s